PASTEF IN POWER: A YEAR OF CHANGE AND CHALLENGES FOR SENEGAL

On March 24, 2024, Senegal turned a new page in its history with the election of Bassirou Diomaye Faye as president, carried by the movement PASTEF (Patriotes Africains du Sénégal pour le Travail, I’Éthique et la Fraternité) and supported by his key ally, Ousmane Sonko, who became Prime Minister. One year after this resounding electoral victory, it is time to assess the achievements, challenges, and prospects of their first year at the helm of the state.

1. Governance Focused on Reform and Transparency From the moment they took office, Diomaye and Sonko demonstrated their commitment to breaking away from the previous administration by implementing a government of reform. Among their first actions:  Audit of Public Finances: An audit was launched to scrutinize the management of public resources under the previous government. Several irregularities were discovered, and cases have been referred to the judiciary.  Reducing Government Spending: The administration cut back on excessive perks for senior officials, reduced administrative expenses, and streamlined government ministries.  Fighting Corruption: Oversight institutions were strengthened, and new procedures were introduced to ensure transparency in public contracts.

2. Economic Policy Focused on Sovereignty The promise of an economically sovereign Senegal was a key pillar of PASTEF’s program. To fulfill this commitment, several initiatives have been launched:  Renegotiation of Oil and Gas Contracts: The government initiated talks with multinational companies to revise exploitation contracts, ensuring a fairer distribution of wealth for Senegalese citizens.  Support for the Agricultural Sector: An investment plan in agriculture was launched to reduce dependence on imports and boost local production.  Promotion of Local Entrepreneurship: A state investment fund was created to support SMEs and facilitate access to credit.

Despite these efforts, economic growth remains fragile due to global economic uncertainties and financial market tensions.

3. Social Reforms and Education: A Commitment to the People One of the key expectations of the Senegalese people was reducing the cost of living and improving social services. Several reforms have been initiated:  Lower Prices for Essential Goods: Stricter price controls were introduced to curb speculation on food and fuel prices.  Education System Reform: A modernization plan for schools and universities was launched, along with a stronger emphasis on vocational training to match labor market needs.  Improvement of Healthcare Infrastructure: Investments were announced for the construction of new hospitals and improved medical coverage, particularly in rural areas. However, some measures have been slow to take effect, causing frustration among certain groups, particularly teachers and healthcare workers.

4. A More Assertive Foreign Policy and a Shift in Partnerships Under Diomaye – Sonko, Senegal has adopted a more sovereign foreign policy, prioritizing national interests in its international relations:  Strengthening Ties with Africa: Greater emphasis on cooperation with neighboring countries and South-South partnerships.  Reevaluating Agreements with France and the EU: A clear intent to renegotiate some economic and military agreements with France to ensure more balanced bilateral relations.  Diversifying Partnerships: Strengthening ties with Turkey, China, and Russia to broaden economic and technological opportunities. While this approach has been well received by some, it has also caused tensions with Senegal’s traditional partners, particularly regarding security and economic cooperation.

5. Challenges and Future Prospects Despite notable progress, PASTEF’s first year in power has been marked by several challenges:  High Social Expectations: Citizens are eager for tangible results, especially regarding employment and cost-of-living reductions.  Active Political Opposition: The previous regime and other political forces are organizing to challenge ongoing reforms.  Managing Internal Tensions: The leadership dynamic between Diomaye and Sonko is closely monitored, and potential internal disagreements could emerge over key strategic issues. Outlook for Year 2: The coming year will be decisive for PASTEF’s leadership. Expectations remain high, and the success of their reforms will depend on their ability to maintain political stability, accelerate policy implementation, and reassure both domestic and international investors.

Conclusion One year after Bassirou Diomaye Faye and Ousmane Sonko took office, Senegal is on a path toward change. While significant progress has been made in governance and transparency, major challenges remain. The Senegalese people, who placed great hope in this new administration, now expect concrete improvements in their daily lives. Year 2 of PASTEF’s rule will be crucial in transforming promises into realities and securing this political movement’s place in Senegal’s history.

Political Uncertainty in Guinea-Bissau as Dispute over Presidential Term Sparks Tension

March 19, 2025 – Bissau, Guinea-Bissau

Guinea-Bissau is facing heightened political tensions as a dispute over the expiration of President Umaro Sissoco Embaló’s mandate has led to divisions between the government and the opposition. The situation has raised concerns among regional and international observers, particularly following reports of political unrest, restrictions on opposition activities, and the expulsion of an ECOWAS mediation team.

Disputed Presidential Term Sparks Controversy

The core of the crisis revolves around a disagreement over the official end date of President Embaló’s five-year mandate. Opposition groups and civil society organizations argue that his term expired on February 27, 2025, exactly five years after he took office. However, the Supreme Court of Justice has ruled that his mandate runs until September 4, 2025, marking five years from when his presidency was confirmed by the court.

Embaló has based his decision to remain in office on the court's ruling and has scheduled presidential and legislative elections for November 23, 2025. However, opposition leaders reject this timeline, accusing him of attempting to extend his rule beyond what they consider constitutionally acceptable.

Political Tensions and Allegations of Repression

The ongoing dispute has led to a politically charged environment in the country. Some human rights organizations and opposition groups have reported incidents of:

 Arrests and intimidation of opposition figures.  Censorship and restrictions on media covering political developments.  Alleged attacks on activists critical of the government.

Government officials have dismissed these allegations, stating that security measures are in place to maintain stability and prevent unrest.

ECOWAS Mediation Efforts and Expulsion of Delegation

In an effort to resolve the crisis, ECOWAS sent a mediation team to Guinea-Bissau to facilitate dialogue between stakeholders. However, the delegation was asked to leave, signaling a potential breakdown in regional diplomatic efforts. The move has sparked debate, with some seeing it as an assertion of national sovereignty and others as a rejection of regional conflict resolution mechanisms.

International Concerns and Calls for Stability

The political situation has drawn international attention, with civil society organizations calling for a peaceful resolution. The West African Civil Society Forum (WACSOF) has urged all parties to respect democratic processes and avoid actions that could escalate tensions.

There have also been discussions about the role of foreign governments, with some civil society groups questioning France’s stance on the crisis. Certain organizations have raised concerns about French President Emmanuel Macron’s relationship with Embaló, while others argue that Guinea-Bissau’s political matters should remain independent of foreign influence.

Path Forward: Calls for Dialogue and Stability As Guinea-Bissau navigates this period of political uncertainty, stakeholders—including the United Nations, the African Union, and ECOWAS—are being encouraged to engage in diplomatic efforts to ensure stability. Key areas of focus include:

1. Encouraging dialogue between political actors to find a peaceful resolution. 2. Ensuring that upcoming elections are conducted in a transparent and inclusive manner. 3. Safeguarding democratic principles while respecting legal institutions. 4. Monitoring the human rights situation to ensure fundamental freedoms are protected.

Conclusion

The ongoing debate over the presidential term remains a central issue in Guinea- Bissau’s political landscape. While the government maintains that the Supreme Court ruling legitimizes Embaló’s continued leadership, opposition groups argue that his term has already expired. As regional and international actors monitor the situation, the coming months will be crucial in determining the country’s democratic trajectory.

Charting a New Course: Is Institutional Reform Enough to Prevent West Africa’s Regional Fragmentation?

Background and Context West Africa has faced significant political upheavals in recent years, with Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger exiting ECOWAS amid growing disillusionment with the bloc’s effectiveness. Military interventions, security crises, and electoral manipulation have eroded democratic norms, fueling instability. ECOWAS has struggled to respond decisively, leaving the region fragmented and its core principles weakened. As the region stands at a crossroads, this editorial examines whether institutional reform alone can prevent further disintegration and highlights the urgent need for comprehensive and transformative change.   In the wake of recent political upheavals and the departure of key member states, West Africa stands at a crossroads. ECOWAS—the Economic Community of West African States—has long been the cornerstone of regional integration, peacekeeping, and economic cooperation. Yet, the fragility of this regional bloc has become increasingly evident. The pressing question now is whether sweeping institutional reforms can truly forestall the disintegration that threatens West Africa’s future. The departure of Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso has reverberated beyond immediate political borders, exposing deep-seated fissures in the foundation of ECOWAS. Critics argue that the current institutional framework, marred by opaque decision-making processes and a perceived disconnect with citizens, has lost its legitimacy. This erosion of trust among member states and the public is a dangerous trend—one that undermines the very ideals of unity and collective action that ECOWAS was founded upon. Institutional reform is undoubtedly a necessary response to these challenges. By overhauling internal governance structures, enhancing transparency, and embedding accountability into every layer of its operations, ECOWAS could re-establish itself as a credible arbiter of regional stability. Reforms that promote inclusivity—bringing civil society, grassroots organizations, and marginalized voices to the table—could transform the bloc into a more responsive and democratic institution. Such measures would not only improve legitimacy but also ensure that policies are better aligned with the diverse needs and aspirations of West African peoples. Yet, the complexity of West Africa’s political landscape suggests that reforms alone may not be a panacea. The region is grappling with multifaceted issues: chronic poverty, ethnic tensions, external economic pressures, and the enduring legacy of colonial borders that continue to influence national identities. These challenges demand more than administrative tweaks; they require a holistic reimagining of how regional cooperation is conceived and operationalized. While institutional reform can lay the groundwork for a more effective ECOWAS, it must be part of a broader strategy that addresses the underlying socioeconomic and political drivers of fragmentation. For instance, economic integration must go hand in hand with social and political dialogue. Without a strong economic rationale for cooperation—one that benefits all member states and reduces inequality—any institutional changes risk being undermined by domestic discontent. Equally, a robust framework for conflict resolution and early warning systems is essential, as internal instability in one state can quickly ripple through the entire region. Moreover, external geopolitical influences cannot be ignored. West Africa is not isolated; its destiny is intertwined with global powers and shifting international alliances. The region’s stability hinges on its ability to navigate these external pressures while remaining true to its own developmental objectives. In this context, ECOWAS must not only reform internally but also recalibrate its diplomatic outreach, forging partnerships that reinforce regional autonomy rather than fostering dependency. Ultimately, the success of any institutional reform depends on political will. Leaders across West Africa must be prepared to embrace difficult choices—prioritizing long-term regional cohesion over short-term national gains. This calls for a level of solidarity and vision that transcends individual ambitions. It is a tall order, but the stakes have never been higher. Without a concerted effort to build a resilient, inclusive, and dynamic ECOWAS, the risk of further fragmentation looms large. The debate, therefore, is not whether institutional reform is necessary—it’s indisputable that it is—but whether such reform can, in isolation, serve as the bulwark against disintegration. The answer lies in a dual approach: comprehensive institutional reform must be coupled with robust socioeconomic initiatives, inclusive governance practices, and a proactive diplomatic strategy. Only through this multifaceted approach can West Africa hope to chart a new course, one that preserves the promise of unity and the strength of its regional community. As the region navigates these turbulent times, the world watches closely. The future of West Africa—and indeed, the future of ECOWAS—will be defined by the ability of its leaders and institutions to adapt, innovate, and unite. Institutional reform is a critical step, but it is just one piece of a larger puzzle. The real challenge lies in harmonizing these reforms with the broader imperatives of economic development, social justice, and regional solidarity. In this intricate dance of politics, policy, and people, the hope remains that West Africa will not only endure but emerge stronger, a beacon of resilience and unity in an increasingly fragmented world.   Editorial by John Okoreni    

Guinea’s FNDC Opposes Extension of Transition

Issue Brief # 02.05.24

Date: 23.05.2024

The Issue:

At a conference on Tuesday 21st May 2024, the National Front for the Defence of the Constitution (FNDC) reiterated its firm stance against any potential extension of the ongoing military-led transition beyond the set deadline of 31st December. Ibrahima Diallo, the FNDC’s operations lead and spokesperson, emphasized the organization’s resolute opposition to prolonging the transition under Mamadi Doumbouya’s leadership. He unequivocally stated, “We say no to this ambition. And as we did during Alpha Condé’s third term saga, we are prepared to resist any attempts at extending the transition period.” Diallo further elucidated that the FNDC is initiating a comprehensive consultation process encompassing all stakeholders such as political entities, trade unions, civil society organizations, journalists and conscientious citizens. This collaboration aims to forge a unified front to thwart any efforts aimed at prolonging the transition indefinitely.

Even though the President, Mamadi Doumbouya, has not issued any statement regarding a prolongation of the transition beyond 31st December, the FNDC and several sections of the Guinean Citizenry seem to be prepared to mobilize against any development to that effect.

The FNDC is a citizen’s coalition and movement in the Republic of Guinea comprising various political parties, civil society groups, and trade unions. Its commitment is aimed at protecting constitutional order, democratic principles and guaranteeing citizen participation in the governance of the country, in opposition to any unelected or undemocratic regime.

WACSOF’s Call to Action:

  1. Urge the Guinea Military Junta to respect the constitution and the will of the people by not prolonging the on-going political transition beyond the stipulated 31st December 2024 time limit.
  2. Calls for continued collaboration and consultation among all citizens’ groups in Guinea to collectively resist any attempts to extend the political transition against the will of the people.
  3. Urge that any actions to be taken in response to alleged attempts to extend the political transition should remain peaceful, in line with democratic norms, and that dialogue remains the preferred path to resolving disagreements. It is essential to maintain stability and peace during this critical period of transition in Guinea.

WACSOF will continue to monitor the evolving situation in Guinea and provide updates on any developments related to the transition process as events unfold.

Read More